January 31, 2020

French judges fail to rule against TOTAL over human rights and environmental violations in Uganda

Paris, France – A Paris court decided not to hear a landmark case where the fossil fuel giant Total had been taken to court by civil society over human rights abuses and environmental violations linked to its oil-related activities in western Uganda. 

The judges considered that the case did not fall within their jurisdiction (as a civil court), and the case should instead be heard by the commercial court. The judges did not examine the evidence brought before it. This is a WIN for Total as its violations in Uganda will continue until the case is heard by a different court, which could take months and even years. The plaintiffs are considering contesting the decision as they feel that Nanterre High Court was the correct avenue.

Total was taken to court by civil society groups for its failure to elaborate and implement its human rights and environmental vigilance plan in Uganda. This is the first-ever legal action of its kind – filed under the 2017 French “Duty of Vigilance Law”, which attempts to enshrine concepts of corporate social responsibility (CSR) into a formalised legal framework while checking corporate negligence of French companies.

The corporation’s presence in the region is due to their participation on the development of the controversial projects of Tilenga and East Africa Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), in partnership with Tullow Oil and China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC).

Extensive investigations revealed serious human rights violations as well as grave environmental abuses linked to oil exploration activities. This led 6 environmental groups (Earth France, Survie, AFIEGO, CRED, NAPE/Friends of the Earth Uganda and NAVODA) in mid-2019 to present Total with a formal demand to revise its Uganda oil project vigilance plan and to implement it. Total subsequently rejected the charges, saying its vigilance plans were complete and that it had carried out Environmental Social Impact Assessments (ESIAs) on the Tilenga and EACOP projects, thus forcing the complainants to take Total to court. 

Edwin Mumbere, an activist in Uganda said, “We sued Total because an environment certificate linked to the Tilenga Project was issued by the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) and it’s against the Ugandan laws to explore or carry out oil-related activities in a protected area such as national parks, and in this case, it’s the Murchison Falls National Park and the River Nile (which is currently used by eleven countries).”

He added, “The water that will be used in the Tilenga project will come from Lake Albert, posing serious implications to the livelihoods of fisherfolk in DRC and Uganda. The use of water from Lake Albert will also reduce access to this natural resource, which is against the basic human rights of citizens of both countries. Furthermore, the proposed pipeline to transport the oil will have a great impact on the wildlife, water and environment, which can’t be replaced. These are the reasons we are against Tilenga project that was awarded to Total.’’

In response to the court ruling, Landry Ninteretse, Regional Team Leader at 350Africa.org said, “This failure to hear the case is a big blow for communities in Uganda who are currently experiencing human rights violations and will have to contend with environmental impacts resulting from Total’s activities. Large multinational corporations need to respect the rule of law and not take community concerns lightly. Despite the disappointing court decision, local communities will continue to resist a devastating project for their lives, livelihoods and ecosystems.”

The court indecision means that Total will not acknowledge the true impact of its oil activities on local communities and the environment, and will not take urgent measures to prevent existing violations from continuing, and new violations from occurring.

This case sets a negative precedent for similar cases, where corporate negligence and impunity will not be checked by courts, and their disregard for human rights and environmental concerns especially those linked to exploration and exploitation of fossil fuels will continue unabated. 



Landry Ninteretse


+46 76 2354038 

Read more

French judges tilt in favour of Total in landmark ruling

French High Court of Justice declares itself incompetent in favour of the Commercial Court

Over fourteen thousand people signed the online “See you in Court, Total!” petition 

Land eviction breeds violence in oil-rich Hoima, Uganda

Total in court for human rights violations in Uganda

Total responds to questions from NGOs on its projects in Uganda

Total suspends planned $3.5 billion Uganda-Tanzania oil pipe

In 2019, global and regional CSOs petitioned against the EACOP

In 2020, the global movement 350.org and its partners have started a new petition against the EACOP